Authors pick Titan as solar system's best place for human colony

Mars is and has long been a popular choice for human colonization should we want or need to leave Earth. But Amanda Hendrix and Charles Wohlforth say that if we’re going to go live somewhere else in the solar system, then Saturn’s moon Titan is the best choice.

Hendrix, a planetary scientist who works for the Planetary Science Institute, and Wohlforth, an award-winning science writer, have just come out with a book, Beyond Earth: Our Path to a New Home in the Planets (Pantheon, 2016). They talked about Titan and the book last week at Town Hall Seattle.

Why go?

“The topic really is not just getting to another planet, but living there and staying there self sufficiently forever,” Wohlforth said. The big question to answer, he noted, is why.

“We don’t, as human beings, normally do big expensive things for no reason at all,” Wohlforth said. “That led us to thinking about what would we want on another planet, or what we would be getting away from here on Earth, that would drive us to want to move to another planet.”

While humans have long had a case of wanderlust, Wohlforth said the reasons to colonize another planet go beyond that.

“Environment drives colonization; it has in the past, and we don’t always call it environment,” he said. “We call it overcrowding or we call it wealth seeking, but really in our society economics is how we talk about environment a lot of the time.”

A key to colonization, he said, is having the resources to do it and to keep it going.

“Making colonies requires technology and it also requires wealth and the ability to make money, and in our world that’s often meant that government gives private industry the money to get started,” Wohlforth said. “Colonies need a reason to exist environmentally or economically, they need major government investment to happen, and ultimately they need a way to support themselves without help from home.”

Why Titan

Hendrix said they developed five main criteria they considered when evaluating a place as a possible site for a human colony. It should have an atmosphere, a magnetosphere, manageable temperatures, a decent amount of gravity, and a hospitable landscape. Among those, she said the first two are most important, as the atmosphere and magnetosphere could shield colonists from harmful radiation.

Charles Wohlforth and Amanda Hendrix talked about their
new book “Beyond Earth” Nov. 18, 2016 at Town Hall
Seattle. Photo: Greg Scheiderer.

It was easy to winnow the list. Venus was rejected out of hand as a super hot hellhole with a poisonous atmosphere that may well be volcanically active.

“It’s really not the greatest environment for a human settlement,” Hendrix understated, “but what’s interesting about Venus is that in that thick atmosphere there is an altitude at which air that we like to breathe is stable. You could, in theory, have a floating city of balloons that are filled with air and where humans could live.”

On Mercury, Mars, or the Moon people would likely have to live underground to avoid radiation. That’s not very appealing, either.

“It’s not really what we’re going for,” Hendrix said. “We’d like to find a place in the solar system, if possible, where we can live on the ground and have a decent amount of radiation shielding.”

Jupiter has a lot of interesting moons, but the king of planets churns out huge doses of radiation and is not a very hospitable place. When you get out to Saturn, though, Titan catches the eye.

“One of the number-one reasons is that it has an Earth-like atmosphere,” Hendrix said. It’s mostly nitrogen with some methane, and is at about 1.5 times the pressure of our atmosphere on Earth. Titan has no magnetosphere of its own, but for much of its orbit it lies inside Saturn’s magnetosphere, so they can share.

“We think that for our key points of shielding from radiation by either an atmosphere or a magnetosphere, Titan is a very good place,” Hendrix said. “This really sets Titan apart from the other places that we looked at in the solar system for a long-term human colony.”

More positive features

We know a lot about Titan through data gathered on 124 fly-bys of this moon by the Cassini spacecraft. Titan has a lot of Earth-like features. It has clouds, rain, swamps, wind, and sand dunes. It has surface liquid—lakes and seas of methane and ethane. (Water would freeze.) It’s cold there, but Titan has pretty constant temperatures across seasons and latitudes.

There’s also a virtually limitless energy source on Titan. Reactions between its atmosphere, sunlight, and energy from Saturn create hydrocarbons that cover the moon’s surface. Colonists could drill down and get water from Titan’s liquid subsurface ocean, separate out the hydrogen and oxygen, giving them the chemistry needed to burn the hydrocarbons.

“You can imagine settlers on Titan having a power plant that takes in methane and water, and the output is energy and breathable oxygen,” Hendrix said. “So it could work out quite well for our colonists—plenty of energy.”

Don’t pack your bags yet

Setting up a colony on Titan would not exactly be a piece of cake, especially if you didn’t survive the trip. NASA has compiled a long list of potential health risks for astronauts, many of them related to radiation exposure, and concluded that space flights of more than a year are too risky for humans. It would take seven years to get to Titan with current technology.

“These are risks that, without some technology leaps,” Wohlforth cautioned, “we’re not going to Saturn. We simply can’t get there and have the astronauts be safe.”

The key to the trip is finding a way to go faster. Wohlforth said the commercial space sector is making some headway on this, and a NASA scientist named Sonny White is actually working on a propulsion system that uses quantum virtual particles and is also tinkering with a warp drive. That notion drew applause from the Trekkies at the talk, but Wohlforth noted that there’s a pretty good dose of skepticism out there. While warp drive may be “poppycock” as one headline writer opined, it’s not unreasonable to think that some smart engineer is out there cooking up a way to make space ships really zip.

Challenges aside, the urge to go and explore and colonize is strong. Hendrix and Wohlforth touched briefly on a lot of topics that are covered in more depth in the book—such considerations as how society might develop elsewhere, how reproduction might change in a Titan colony, and other challenges and opportunities.

“We really like Titan as a potential human colony location,” Hendrix concluded. “We think it has a lot to offer.”

---

You can purchase Beyond Earth by clicking the title link or book cover image above. Buying through Seattle Astronomy supports our efforts to bring you interesting space and astronomy stories, and we thank you.

Asteroid spotting with NEOWISE

Joe Masiero, a scientist with the
NEOWISE project, spoke at the meeting
 of the Seattle Astronomical Society
Nov. 16, 2016. Photo: Greg Scheiderer.

The solar system seems like a big place with lots of empty space in it, at least until an astronomer plays a simulation of the orbits of its asteroids. Such a simulation looks like an angry swarm of bees, and Earth appears likely to be stung by them several times per day.

Some scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory convinced the agency a few years ago to give them the keys to a hibernating but still semi-functional space telescope, and now the Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE) is on the hunt for asteroids and other near-Earth objects. Mission scientist Joe Masiero talked about NEOWISE at this week’s meeting of the Seattle Astronomical Society.
Masiero explained that NEOWISE is a part of NASA’s near earth object observation program.

“This is one of the funding lines that NASA has specifically dedicated to discovering and characterizing objects that come close to the Earth,” he explained. “It’s one of a number of missions and a number of telescopes that do these surveys for near-Earth objects trying to look out to see if anything is posing a hazard to our planet.”

Used scope for sale

That important work is being done by a hand-me-down space telescope. WISE launched in December of 2009 on a mission to essentially build an infrared atlas of stuff to help scientists decide where to point the James Webb Space Telescope when it becomes operational. WISE looked for the most luminous galaxies in the universe, close and cold brown dwarfs, and other sorts of objects for Webb to explore. That mission complete by the following September—and two of four infrared wavelength detectors shot because their coolant ran out—WISE was put into hibernation for almost three years. But the JPL team thought the 40-centimeter scope could still be used for science with the two infrared detectors that didn’t need cooling, and convinced NASA to resurrect WISE as NEOWISE. They fired the scope up again in December of 2013.

“The goals of the NEOWISE mission are to survey near-Earth objects,” Masiero explained, “both to discover new ones, but even more importantly, to characterize ones that we currently know about, to figure out how big they are and how reflective they are, because it’s the reflectivity, the albedo of an object, gives you an initial hint as to what it’s made of.”

There are a number of programs looking for near-Earth objects, such as PanSTARRS and the Catalina Sky Survey, but Masiero said NEOWISE brings something different to the table.

“One of the benefits of NEOWISE as an infrared survey is that we’re discovering a lot of these objects that are very dark—that look like a lump of coal—and sometimes that are very big,” he explained, adding that this is the mission’s special niche.

“There are other surveys finding more near-Earth objects than we are,” he said, “but what we excel at is finding these very dark objects that other telescopes miss.”

The mission has been prolific. Between WISE and NEOWISE, Masiero said they’ve discovered about a thousand near-Earth objects larger than a kilometer.

“Those are the dinosaur-killer level,” he said. In addition, they’ve found about 20,000 objects in the 100-meter class; the type that could cause a “bad day” were they to hit Earth.

Science, too

Possible mass extinction is reason enough to keep an eye out for near-Earth objects, but Masiero notes that there’s science to be done as well. Since these objects are close in they’re easier to study and visit, and there are a number of future missions planned to do just that. Asteroids could also give clues to the formation of the solar system.

Masiero’s particular interest is in looking at main-belt asteroids, which don’t get as much study because they’re so hard to see. One interesting thing they’ve been able to do with NEOWISE is to determine the albedo of asteroids. They’ve found that many objects with a matching albedo also share the same orbital inclination. These asteroid “families” traveling in clusters also often match in optical color.

“This is a single large object that something crashed into and shattered into hundreds or thousands of smaller pieces,” Masiero said. “Because it came from a single object, they all have a similar composition.”

These families are pretty new, geologically speaking. Masiero said that families that formed in the last billion years or so make up over a third of all the objects we know about in the main asteroid belt. NEOWISE data may help scientists track the families, learn what they’re made of, and how they evolved.

The next generation

NEOWISE is funded through next summer, and while they’re hoping to get an extension, eventually the satellite’s orbit will decay and it will burn up in the atmosphere. Masiero said they’re now proposing a new mission, called NEOcam. This would be similar to NEOWISE, except the telescope would be a bit bigger, with a 50-centimeter mirror, and they would fly it out to the first Lagrangian point—L₁—where it would stay cold and work indefinitely.

NEOcam: NASA/JPL-Caltech

“If we’re selected we would fly this space telescope specifically designed to search for near-Earth asteroids in the infrared,” Masiero said. “The goal of this survey is to characterize these objects, quantify them, and help us predict what kind of hazard they could pose to the Earth.”

NEOcam could take longer exposures and thus look deeper into space and find more objects. He expects a five-year survey would find some 300,000 near-Earth objects and eight million main-belt asteroids—an increase of an order of magnitude for both.

“This would improve upon the census taken by NEOWISE, helping us characterize the hazard, but also—very interesting from a scientific point of view—figure out where these populations turn over, how many you have in each size band, and hopefully trace them back to where they come from,” Masiero said.

Citizen science

If you want to sift through the data on your own, it’s all available online. Masiero said it is all on the Infrared Science Archive (IRSA), where there are millions of images and only a few people to look at them. He said the Planetary Data System and NASA’s Horizons tool have also incorporated NEOWISE data.

Perhaps you will spot a killer asteroid or figure out how the solar system formed.

Mapping the heavens with Priya Natarajan

Priyamvada Natarajan, a theoretical astrophysicist at Yale University, is excited to be working in physics and astronomy at a time she and others call the “golden age of cosmology.”
“The maturity of our theoretical understanding, the sophistication of our instruments and tools that allow us to get the data—spacecraft, detectors—and the advanced computing are all aligned at the moment,” Natarajan said this week during a talk at Town Hall Seattle.

Theoretical astrophysicist Priyamvada
Natarajan spoke Nov. 14, 2016 at Town
Hall Seattle.

Natarajan has done a lot of work on mapping dark matter and dark energy, on gravitational lensing, and on figuring out how supermassive black holes are formed. It’s the latter that has her excited for the launch of the James Webb Space Telescope. She’s been a leader in pushing the idea that supermassive black holes could be formed by the direct collapse of matter. The physics pencils out, and Webb will peer back and possibly find the most distant, and therefore the first, black holes, and perhaps validate her ideas.

“The fact that you can come up with an idea as a scientist, for me, that’s the privilege,” she said.

Natarajan is the author of Mapping the Heavens: The Radical Scientific Ideas That Reveal the Cosmos (Yale University Press, 2016). She said she wrote the book not only to help us understand new discoveries about black holes and dark matter, but also to demystify the process of science.

“I believe very strongly that the current rampant disbelief in science stems from the contingent nature, the provisionality of science.” Natarajan said. “It’s something that’s very hard for the public at large to understand.”
The plus side is that cosmology and astronomy have the potential to win converts.

“Unlike many other fields in science, the night sky belongs to all of us,” she said. “We have to just look up and it’s there; the glory and the awe of the night sky.”

We know a lot

Natarajan finds it interesting that we know so much about the universe, with pretty solid evidence for much of what has happened since the tiniest fraction of a second after the Big Bang.

“It still stuns me that with a cantaloupe-sized gelatinous thing in our skull we’ve been able to figure all of this out,” she laughed. Yet despite all we do know, she said there is still a lot of mystery about our peculiar universe.

“We happen to live in one in which the total energy content of the universe is dominated by two components that we don’t know what they are,” she said.

Chart: NASA

What we call them are dark matter, which makes up 24 percent of the universe, and dark energy, which makes up 71 percent. We and all the stuff we see are less than five percent. Though we don’t know what dark matter is, Natarajan said there is solid evidence that it is indeed out there.

“The idea came out of an empirical need to explain an observation,” she said. Oddly enough, one of her other research interests, black holes, were conceived in exactly the opposite fashion.

“Black holes were actually proposed as a mathematical entity,” she noted. “They were a mathematical solution to Einstein’s equations, and they eventually became real.”

A little history

Dark matter was first suggested by Fritz Zwicky in 1933. Vera Rubin and others looking at galaxies in the 1970s proposed it as the reason rapidly spinning galaxies don’t fly apart. Natarajan said more than 80 years of research has left little doubt.

“We have incontrovertible evidence from many independent lines of investigation for the existence of dark matter because of the effects it produces, although it has not been directly detected yet,” she said. “We don’t know the particle.”

There are two lines of evidence, according to Natarajan, that make dark matter far more than just an inference.

“We can exquisitely map it at the moment, even though we can’t see it, because of the gravitational influence that it exerts,” she said. “The other way in which we can detect dark matter is the impact that matter has on the propagation of light in our universe.”

This is where her work on gravitational lensing fits in. Large galaxy clusters, with as many as a thousand galaxies, can act as a sort of gravitational lens on steroids. Such clusters would be held together by enormous amounts of dark matter. The relativity “pothole” created by the cluster could be strong enough to split a beam of light.

“You end up seeing multiple images of an object where in reality there is only one object,” Natarajan said, noting that this has been observed many times now. Interestingly, she points out that the physics of both Newton and of Einstein would predict the effect.

“You can apply both of these arguments to clusters and you infer the same amount of dark matter,” she said. “In my opinion that is really, really strong evidence, compelling evidence, because they’re completely different world views and they still converge. There’s no escaping the concept of dark matter.”

Search for the holy grail

Natarajan said this sort of research may help us get to the holy grail of physics: a quantum theory of gravity.

“The motivation is to look for gaps, look for disagreements, and look for anomalies where an observation is actually inconsistent with our theoretical expectation,” she said.

A couple of great examples of this came out of the 1800s. The orbit of Uranus didn’t agree with Newton’s Laws, so they did the math and figured another planet could cause the observed discrepancies. That led to the discovery of Neptune. At the same time, there were anomalies in Mercury’s orbit, which led to the proposal that another planet, called Vulcan, was the cause. Vulcan was never found, but years later general relativity explained the precession of Mercury’s orbit perfectly.

“In one case the theory remained intact and an anomaly refined our understanding,” Natarajan said. “In the other case it pointed the way to the existence of a more fundamental covering theory that was yet to come.”

We can’t wait for the next breakthroughs in this golden age of cosmology.

---

You can purchase Mapping the Heavens by clicking the book cover or title link above. Buying through Seattle Astronomy helps defray our costs of creating and serving these articles. Thank you!

Book review: Chasing Venus

Like many astronomy buffs, we’ve been putting a great deal of thought into deciding where we’ll go to try to see the total solar eclipse that will cross the United States next August 21. Seattle Astronomy has done 13 articles and a dozen podcasts on the topic. As with the 2012 Venus Transit or this year’s Mercury Transit, the key is figuring out where you’ll have the best odds for clear skies, and how to get to an alternate site if the clouds beat those odds on eclipse day.

With such thinking fresh in mind, I eagerly snapped up a copy of Andrea Wulf’s book Chasing Venus: The Race to Measure the Heavens (Vintage Books, 2012) when I spotted it in the astronomy section of Powell’s Books during a recent trip to Portland.

Chasing Venus is the story of the Venus transits of 1761 and 1769, and the international scientific effort to accurately observe the transit from many spots around the globe and use the solar parallax between those observations to calculate the distance between the Sun and the Earth, and thus get a true grasp for the size of the solar system.

The whole project was the brainchild of British astronomer Edmund Halley, who predicted the 1761 transit and wrote an essay in 1716 that urged scientists to spread out across the globe to make these vital observations. Halley was 60 at the time of the writing and would have to live to be 104 to see it himself; he died in 1742.

Scientists and nations answered the call with enthusiasm. This was, Wulf writes, “a century in which science was worshipped, and myth at last conquered by rational thought.” One is tempted to think that we’ve regressed in the intervening 247 years.

Technology was a challenge for the observers. They had good telescopes, but had to transport them long distances, in many cases, and set up observatories in remote locations. A bigger challenge was the actual timing of the transit. Clocks were not yet reliably accurate, and precise determination of longitude was still a challenge. The greater difficulty was actually getting to the observation sites. It was easy for those in the cities, but for the calculations to work observations had to be made from points on Earth as far apart as possible. Thus for every astronomer observing from the relative comfort of Paris, London, or Madrid another team was on a treacherous expedition to the far-flung corners of the world in an era when it took several months to get a letter from the American colonies to the European capitals. For the 1761 transit, the journey of French astronomer Jean-Baptiste Chappe d’Auteroche to Siberia was particularly harrowing, and those traveling by sea had to navigate not only the sea but the politics of the day, lest their efforts be defeated by heavy waters or hostile navies.

Imagine the mindset of astronomers who, at great expense, had to travel for months, and in many cases more than a year, in order to set up and prepare for an event that, if it was cloudy during the wrong six hours, would be a total bust. It makes our deliberations about where to go to see the 2017 total solar eclipse seem trivial by comparison.

Measurements of the first transit proved largely unsuccessful. Weather foiled many of the expeditions, and a variety of problems caused great variance in the accuracy of the data collected. But they learned from the effort and improved their approaches, and by the time of the 1769 transit, the combined observations narrowed down the distance to the Sun to within four million miles, which was quite an improvement.

Wulf spins a great tale of scientific inquiry, daring (and not-so-daring) adventurers, political intrigue, and fascinating personalities involved in what was arguably the biggest collaborative international scientific event up to that time. It’s a marvelous read and highly recommended.

Special cookies and two books about next year's total solar eclipse

I’ve recently read two fantastic books about the total solar eclipse that will sweep across the United States on August 21, 2017. One is geared toward kids, while the other could be a useful tool for serious adult eclipse chasers.

The Big Eclipse (Orbit Oregon, 2016), written and illustrated by Nancy Coffelt, is a beautifully done 16-page book that children will love and easily understand. It’s a lighthearted and playful eclipse primer that explains what will happen and how to watch it safely, looks at odd effects of eclipses, shows how to make a pinhole projector, and has a glossary with meanings for all of those new words like totality and umbraphile. While aimed at children the book is not dumbed down, and it’s certified “astronomically accurate” by an eclipse expert at the American Astronomical Society.

Sold separately is The Big Eclipse Activity Book that supplements The Big Eclipse. It is packed with games, puzzles, art and imagination projects, and even has a recipe for “eclipse cookies” that you can make and serve at your total eclipse viewing party. It would be great for school projects, family fun and learning, or just for a kid who loves to read and figure things out solo. Grab both volumes; they’re perfect for kids around ages five to eleven.

We did an earlier article and podcast with Michael Zeiler, who along with his wife Polly White operates the dandy eclipse website GreatAmericanEclipse.com. Zeiler also has come out with a book, a compact 44-pager titled simply See the Great American Eclipse of August 21, 2017 (Great American Eclipse LLC, 2016). The book is packed with maps and information, touching on the splendor and science of the event, safe viewing, best places to see the eclipse, strategies for success, and lots more maps. It’s super informative, and small enough to slip into your satchel or even a larger pocket and head out for some eclipse chasing.
As discussed in the podcast, Zeiler works hard to make his maps not only accurate and informative but visually pleasing. He dose marvelous work, and he has a selection of poster-size maps suitable for framing on the website.

Safety tools are included with both books. The Big Eclipse comes with a rectangular solar viewer, while a copy of See the Great American Eclipse will also get you a couple of pairs of eclipse glasses.

You can snag all three books by visiting the links above. Buying through Seattle Astronomy helps us defray the costs of bringing you great space and astronomy articles, and we thank you for that.
There’s more info and additional eclipse swag on the websites for Orbit Oregon and The Great American Eclipse.

LSST: mining the sky in 4D

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is going to be a unique astronomical instrument.
“Unlike a lot of other telescopes around the world, LSST is actually aptly named,” joked Dr. David Reiss of the University of Washington at a recent gathering of Astronomy on Tap Seattle at Peddler Brewing Company in Ballard. Reiss and Dr. John Parejko, two UW astronomers involved in the project, gave an overview of the telescope, which is under construction in Chile.

John Parejko (left) and David Reiss, research scientists at the
University of Washington, discussed the Large Synoptic Survey
Telescope at an Astronomy on Tap Seattle event October 28 at
Peddler Brewing Company in Ballard. Photo: Greg Scheiderer.

As for the name, Parejko noted the scope will be truly large. It will have an 8.4-meter mirror, a 3.2-gigapixel camera, and will take an image of the night sky every 30 seconds.

“We’re going to generate 15 terabytes of data every single night,” Parejko noted. “That means by the end of the survey we’ll have 30 trillion database entries, and over half an exabyte of data and images being catalogued.”

“That’s a lot of data even for those of you who work at Amazon,” he quipped.

Synoptic is the word even the scientists say they have to look up every time. Essentially it means that the instrument will look at everything as a whole and provide a synopsis.

“Unlike a lot of other telescopes, the LSST has been designed to serve thousands of astronomers with interests ranging from supernovae or exploding stars, to planets and asteroids, to the universe as a whole,” Reiss explained.

It’s a survey because LSST will not look at just one object.

“Not only is it covering all kids of different science, it’s actually covering the whole sky,” Parejko said. They hope to start observing in 2022, and the 10-year survey will photograph the entire sky every three nights. They expect to discover 37 billion stars and galaxies.

Lastly, it’s a telescope, but it’s much more.

“The main thing that LSST is going to produce is lots and lots of data,” Reiss said, “images and catalogs and databases of all of the objects in the sky that are going to be shared with everybody in real time.” With new information coming in constantly, they’ll be effectively creating a 10-year, multi-color, ultra high-resolution movie of the night sky.

The building

Parejko described the facility, which is being built on the Cerro Pachón ridge at 8,700 feet elevation, not far from town of La Serena in the mountain desert of Chile. It’s a good site for an observatory, with high elevation and low humidity. The building has been designed with a lab for working on the mirror and other parts of the telescope so that they don’t have to send things off the mountain for repairs.

“That means we minimize our down time; we can spend as much time as possible taking data,” Parejko said. You can watch progress of the construction on the LSST webcam.

An artists’ concept of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.
Image: LSST.

The telescope itself will be short, squat, and compact, with the secondary mirror and camera located out at the end. They’re building it short to reduce wobble when it moves—another measure for minimizing down time. They were able to keep it short by using a different shape on the outside of the primary mirror than on the inside. Light will come into the scope, reflect off the outside of the primary to the secondary mirror, back down to the inside of the primary, which will beam it up to the camera.

“That’s how we can keep the telescope so short and compact, by folding the light like that,” Parejko explained.

The camera, about the size of a Smart Car, will have three lenses and space for five filters. The detector will feature 21 “rafts” each with nine CCDs. If one raft breaks, they’ll just pull it out, plug in another, and keep imaging.

The building will also include a major computer lab. That’s still under design.

LSST software

Reiss explained that, with so much data being collected, computing will be important. Essentially, they’re building, “sort of a Google index of the entire night sky over the course of ten years.” To do that, they’re creating a high-speed network to connect the telescope in Chile to a supercomputing center in Illinois. There, they’ll look for things that move or blow up, and expect to spot some 10 million events every night. Information about these discoveries will go out in nightly alerts to interested users.

“We’re basically providing the equivalent of astronomical Twitter, Google, and Amazon Web Services to the community,” Reiss said.

“We’re going to be sending out nearly 600 gigabytes worth of simply just these alerts every night,” he added. “If one of you were going to subscribe to these you’re going to max out your Comcast monthly allocation in one night.”

Researchers will be able to upload their software or algorithms into the LSST computing cluster and do calculations in the cloud, rather than having to download all of that data. Many institutions will receive the alerts and write algorithms that will help users pick and choose data. There will likely be smartphone apps that will allow users to, say, track their favorite asteroid, and people will be able to use the data to learn about the universe or do citizen science. Reiss noted that, by keeping a constant eye on the sky, we will be able to spot lots of the sorts of things that we only find today through the luck of looking in the right place at the right time.

LSST goals

The main science goals of the LSST are to learn about dark matter and dark energy, catalog the solar system, watch how things change, and learn about the structure and formation of the Milky Way.

The LSST team includes 39 institutional members, among them 21 colleges and universities. The UW is a founding member. The project employs 200 astronomers and engineers from 19 different countries. The total cost of getting LSST up and running by 2022 will be about $400 million. That sounds like a lot of money, but Reiss and Parejko pointed out, given the season, that it’s about what Americans spend on Halloween costumes for their pets in a typical year. Funding for the project has come from the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, and through fundraising by the nonprofit LSST Corporation.

Astronomy on Tap Seattle is organized by graduate students in astronomy at the University of Washington. The events are free, but you can help them cover the costs of creating them by donating online to the Friends of Astronomy Fund at the UW.